Skip to main content
The working checklist

Every WCAG 2.2 requirement, one working checklist

Fifty-five success criteria stand between a website and WCAG 2.2 Level AA. Here is every one of them - grouped by principle, linked to a plain-language explanation, and honest about which ones automation can check for you.

WCAG 2.2 library
A WCAG 2.2 compliance checklist is the list of the 55 Level A and AA success criteria a website must meet to conform to WCAG 2.2 at Level AA - the conformance level accessibility laws reference. This page is that checklist: every criterion grouped under the four POUR principles, each linked to a plain-language page explaining what it requires, who it serves and how to pass it.

What is a WCAG 2.2 compliance checklist?

WCAG 2.2 - the current version of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines - contains 86 testable success criteria organized under four principles: content must be Perceivable, Operable, Understandable and Robust (POUR). Each criterion carries a level: A (the floor), AA (the standard target) or AAA (aspirational). Conforming at Level AA means meeting the 31 Level A and the 24 Level AA criteria - 55 checks in all, and that is what this checklist covers.

Level AA is the target because it is the bar the outside world uses: courts and regulators point to WCAG AA when they define what an accessible website is, which makes these 55 items the closest thing web accessibility has to an official to-do list. WCAG 2.2 builds on 2.1 - everything you did for 2.1 still counts - adding six new A/AA criteria and retiring one old one (4.1.1).

Every item below links to its page in our criteria library, where each criterion in the standard is explained one by one: what it requires in plain language, who depends on it, how to meet it and the failures that trip sites up.

How to use this checklist

Treat the list as a workflow, not a scorecard:

  1. Scan first. Run the free accessibility checker on your key templates, or the crawler across the whole site. Automation reliably tests roughly a third of the criteria - contrast, alt text, labels, ARIA, structure - and hands you an instant list of confirmed failures to start from.
  2. Fix templates, not pages. Most failures live in shared components; one fixed header, form or card closes the same finding on every page that uses it.
  3. Let automation carry its share - and only its share. EqualWeb's accessibility widget resolves ~80% of the common issues automation can recognize, which accelerates remediation enormously. But no tool ticks items off this checklist for you: a criterion counts as met only when testing on your real pages shows it holds.
  4. Verify the rest by hand. A keyboard-only pass, a screen reader pass and a 400% zoom pass on your critical flows cover most of what machines cannot judge - the remaining two thirds of the criteria.
  5. Date and document each pass. A checklist you can show - who tested what, when, and what was fixed - is the evidence that matters if a demand letter ever arrives.

Perceivable - 20 criteria (9 A, 11 AA)

Information and interface components must be presentable in ways users can perceive - see it, hear it, or read it through assistive technology.

Operable - 20 criteria (14 A, 6 AA)

Navigation and interaction must work for everyone - keyboard-only users, people with tremors, people who cannot see a pointer.

Understandable - 13 criteria (7 A, 6 AA)

Content and controls must behave predictably, read clearly, and forgive mistakes.

Robust - 2 criteria (1 A, 1 AA)

Content must keep working as browsers and assistive technologies evolve.

Robust used to hold a third criterion: 4.1.1 Parsing was removed in WCAG 2.2 because modern browsers already repair the markup errors it targeted. If your old checklist still lists it, cross it off.

The 9 new success criteria in WCAG 2.2

If your site already met WCAG 2.1 AA, these are the only additions between you and 2.2 - six at A/AA (on the checklist above) and three at AAA (beyond the legal target, listed for completeness):

CriterionLevelWhat it requires
2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum)AASticky headers, footers and banners must never fully hide the element that has keyboard focus.
2.4.12 Focus Not Obscured (Enhanced)AAANo part of the focused element may be hidden by other content.
2.4.13 Focus AppearanceAAAFocus indicators must meet minimum size and contrast requirements.
2.5.7 Dragging MovementsAAEvery dragging action needs a simple single-pointer alternative.
2.5.8 Target Size (Minimum)AAInteractive targets need at least 24×24 CSS pixels or equivalent spacing.
3.2.6 Consistent HelpAHelp mechanisms must appear in a consistent place across pages.
3.3.7 Redundant EntryAA process must not ask for the same information twice.
3.3.8 Accessible Authentication (Minimum)AALogin must not depend on a cognitive test; paste and password managers must work.
3.3.9 Accessible Authentication (Enhanced)AAANo cognitive test at all in authentication, not even object recognition.

Checking the checklist: automated vs manual

The honest split for verifying these 55 items:

The split is the same whether your target is ADA compliance, the European Accessibility Act or a national standard - they all resolve to these WCAG criteria, and full WCAG compliance always takes both halves. For the how-to on each half, see WCAG testing.

Frequently asked questions

How many success criteria are in the WCAG 2.2 AA checklist?

55 - the 31 Level A and 24 Level AA success criteria of WCAG 2.2. The full standard contains 86 criteria including Level AAA; the old 4.1.1 Parsing criterion was removed in 2.2.

Is WCAG 2.2 AA legally required?

Laws reference WCAG rather than writing their own technical rules. US courts and the Department of Justice treat WCAG AA as the ADA benchmark - the Title II rule names WCAG 2.1 AA for state and local government - and the European Accessibility Act builds on WCAG through EN 301 549. Working to 2.2 AA covers those baselines and materially reduces legal risk; no checklist guarantees immunity.

Can a tool make my site WCAG 2.2 compliant automatically?

No. Automated tools test roughly a third of the criteria, and EqualWeb's accessibility widget resolves ~80% of the common issues automation can recognize - a strong head start, not conformance. The remaining checks need human judgement, which is why serious programs pair automation with expert review.

How is this different from a WCAG 2.1 checklist?

WCAG 2.1 AA has 50 Level A and AA criteria; 2.2 AA has 55. Version 2.2 adds six A/AA criteria - focus not obscured, dragging movements, target size, consistent help, redundant entry and accessible authentication - and removes 4.1.1 Parsing. Everything you did for 2.1 still counts toward 2.2.

How often should I re-check the list?

Treat it as a cycle, not a one-off: every release can break a criterion that passed. Keep automated monitoring running continuously, and repeat the manual pass after redesigns, new templates or checkout changes - at minimum once a year.

Sources
  • W3C, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 - w3.org
  • W3C WAI, Understanding WCAG 2.2 - w3.org/WAI
  • W3C WAI, What's New in WCAG 2.2 - w3.org/WAI
  • W3C WAI, How to Meet WCAG (Quick Reference) - w3.org/WAI

Last updated . Reviewed by the EqualWeb accessibility team.

Find out which of the 55 you already pass

Run a free scan with the EqualWeb accessibility checker for the automatable third, then let certified IAAP/CPWA experts verify the rest - audit, remediation, monitoring and documentation included.

Book a meeting Start Free Trial